Moon Men, Giants, and Burning Bodies: Inside the New York Sun’s 19th-Century Hoaxes
Tonight's Episode
In the 1800s, one newspaper helped convince the world that civilization existed on the Moon, giants once ruled America, people could burst into flames without warning, mermaids swam the South Pacific, and entire cities lay frozen beneath polar ice. That paper was the New York Sun.In this episode of The Strange History Podcast, we explore what really happened to the New York Sun—how it rose to fame through sensational reporting, why its most famous hoaxes worked so well, and how 19th-century readers learned to trust print more than proof. From the Great Moon Hoax to spontaneous human combustion, this is the strange true history of how newspapers once shaped reality itself—and why belief traveled faster than verification in the age before fact-checking.
Perfect for fans of weird history, media scandals, forgotten hoaxes, Victorian mysteries, and true stories that sound too strange to be real… but were printed anyway.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-strange-history-podcast--5773362/support.
🎧 The Strange History Podcast Love bizarre true stories, forgotten scandals, and history’s most unhinged moments?
Submit your ideas for The Strange History Podcast
Follow The Strange History Podcast wherever you listen and never miss an episode. 🔗 Listen & Subscribe:
Apple Podcasts
Spotify
iHeartRadio
Audible
New episodes regularly. History gets weird here.
Speaker 1: Dear listeners, there was a time when ink was authority
Speaker 1: and imagination wore a lab coat. In the eighteen hundreds,
Speaker 1: newspapers didn't just report the world, they expanded it. Giants
Speaker 1: were unearthed, mermaids were spotted, people burst into flames, and
Speaker 1: entire cities were said to lie frozen beneath the ice.
Speaker 1: Tonight were stepping back into an age when belief traveled
Speaker 1: faster than proof, and wonder was printed as fact. Welcome
Speaker 1: to the Strange History Podcast. Today we dive into the
Speaker 1: New York Sun and how its fantastical stories created a
Speaker 1: newspaper empire. In August of eighteen thirty five, readers of
Speaker 1: The New York Sun were treated to what appeared to
Speaker 1: be the scientific breakthrough of the century. Across six serialized articles,
Speaker 1: the paper announced that life had been discovered on the Moon,
Speaker 1: not microbial hints or vague shadows, but complex ecosystems, intelligent beings,
Speaker 1: and architecture. The tone was calm, academic, and devastatingly convincing.
Speaker 1: The series claimed to be a reprint from the Edinburgh
Speaker 1: Journal of Science and was attributed to a respected astronomer
Speaker 1: working with a revolutionary telescope that used an advanced lens
Speaker 1: system and hydro oxygen microscopy. This device, readers were told
Speaker 1: could magnify lunar features to the point where individual animals
Speaker 1: could be observed moving across the surface. The telescope itself
Speaker 1: was described in loving technical detail, huge lenses, precise measurements,
Speaker 1: and optical terminology just obscure enough to feel authentic. The
Speaker 1: first article set the stage. It described sweeping lunar landscapes,
Speaker 1: rolling planes, deep valleys, rivers, and forests of red and
Speaker 1: purple vegetation. According to the report, the moon was not
Speaker 1: a dead rock, but a thriving world with a climate
Speaker 1: suitable for life. One passage described a luxuriant growth of
Speaker 1: vegetation along the edges of lunar seas, carefully noting their
Speaker 1: dimensions and geological features as if lifted from a real
Speaker 1: field study. The second and third articles escalated quickly. Observers
Speaker 1: allegedly spotted animals resembling bison, goats, and unicorn like creatures
Speaker 1: with a single horn. These weren't presented as fantastical monsters,
Speaker 1: but as logical evolutionary responses to lunar gravity and atmosphere.
Speaker 1: One account calmly noted herds grazing peacefully, as if the
Speaker 1: Moon were just another unexplored continent waiting to be mapped.
Speaker 1: Then came the part everyone remembers. In the fourth article,
Speaker 1: the authors introduced the moon's most astonishing inhabitants, humanoid beings
Speaker 1: roughly four feet tall, covered in copper colored hair, with
Speaker 1: large bat like wings. They were described as intelligent, social,
Speaker 1: and capable of flight. The article referred to them as
Speaker 1: vespertilio homo, a Latinized name that instantly lent authority. These
Speaker 1: beings lived in groups, communicated with gestures, and built simple
Speaker 1: shelters near rivers and forests. One passage described them gathering
Speaker 1: in what appeared to be communal spaces, possibly for conversation
Speaker 1: or worship. The fifth article went even further, claiming the
Speaker 1: discovery of elaborate lunar temples made of sapphire like stone.
Speaker 1: These structures were said to gleam in the sunlight, arranged
Speaker 1: symmetrically and suggesting not just intelligence, but culture, esthetics, and religion.
Speaker 1: The implication was staggering. Humanity was no longer alone and
Speaker 1: might not even be the most spiritually advanced species in
Speaker 1: the cosmos. The final article abruptly ended the observations. According
Speaker 1: to the report, the powerful telescope had been destroyed when
Speaker 1: sunlight overheated the lens, rendering further study impossible. This detail
Speaker 1: was crucial. It neatly explained why no one else could
Speaker 1: verify the claims. The moon had revealed its secrets and
Speaker 1: then slammed the door shut. Public reaction was immediate and intense.
Speaker 1: Other newspapers reprinted the articles in full. Coffee houses buzzed
Speaker 1: with debate. Clergy openly discussed whether lunar beings had souls
Speaker 1: and whether salvation applied beyond earth. Some religious leaders saw
Speaker 1: the discovery as proof of divine creativity, while others quietly
Speaker 1: panicked if intelligent beings existed elsewhere, what did that mean
Speaker 1: for humanity's place in creation. A few astronomers raised concerns
Speaker 1: the descriptions didn't quite align with known lunar conditions. The
Speaker 1: supposed telescope violated basic principles of optics. The Edinburgh Journal
Speaker 1: of Science never published such a report, but skepticism struggled
Speaker 1: to compete with awe. The writing was too confident, too detailed,
Speaker 1: too reasonable. This wasn't wild fantasy, it was science flavored wonder. Eventually,
Speaker 1: the truth became unavoidable. The journal didn't exist, the telescope
Speaker 1: was impossible. The story was a fabrication, likely written by
Speaker 1: journalist Richard Adams Locke as satire, exaggeration, or possibly a
Speaker 1: calculated circulation stunt. The Sun never issued a formal apology.
Speaker 1: It didn't need to. Its readership had skyrocketed, the paper
Speaker 1: had won. What makes the Great Moon Hoax endure isn't
Speaker 1: just that people believed it. It's why they believed it.
Speaker 1: The hoax succeeded because it exploited a perfect moment in history,
Speaker 1: a public hungry for discovery, dazzled by scientific progress, and
Speaker 1: unaccustomed to questioning authoritative print. The articles didn't demand belief,
Speaker 1: they earned it, line by line, with plausible detail and
Speaker 1: scholarly restraint. For a brief moment in eighteen thirty five,
Speaker 1: the moon wasn't a distant symbol or poetic backdrop. It
Speaker 1: was alive, and humanity wanted that to be true, just
Speaker 1: badly enough to forget to ask harder questions concern.
Speaker 2: You may forget entire civilizations beneath the ice. Then you
Speaker 2: need Professor Thatchwick's Arctic Memory Salts, the only tonic scientifically
Speaker 2: inspired by things we swear explorers definitely saw just one spoonful,
Speaker 2: sharpens the mind, restores lost recollections, and may help you
Speaker 2: remember cities that history inconveniently forgot. Side effects include vivid hallucinations,
Speaker 2: unearned confidence, and loudly correcting historians at dinner parties available
Speaker 2: at apothecaries, ship chandlers, and any newspaper willing to print
Speaker 2: the word confirmed.
Speaker 1: Let's move on to the eighteen forties, when the New
Speaker 1: York Sun began telling readers something extraordinary. The land beneath
Speaker 1: their feet once belonged to giants, not metaphorical giants, literal ones,
Speaker 1: towering humans eight to twelve feet tall, whose enormous bones
Speaker 1: were allegedly being unearthed during canal construction, railroad expansion, and
Speaker 1: the excavation of ancient earthen mounds. And at the center
Speaker 1: of this growing fascination was the ever enthusiastic New York Sun,
Speaker 1: which treated these discoveries not as folklore but as serious
Speaker 1: archaeological revelations. The articles followed a familiar and effective formula.
Speaker 1: A labor crew would be digging, often along a canal
Speaker 1: or railroad cut, when their shovels struck something unnatural bones
Speaker 1: too large, skulls too wide, femurs that dwarfed those of
Speaker 1: any known human. The Sun reported these fines with scholarly restraint,
Speaker 1: citing local doctors, professors, or gentlemen of science who had
Speaker 1: examined the remains and confirmed their astonishing size. Measurements were
Speaker 1: always included a jawbone capable of swallowing two fists, teeth
Speaker 1: twice the size of a modern man's vertebrae, described as
Speaker 1: massive beyond comparison. One widely circulated account described a skeleton
Speaker 1: uncovered in the Midwest measuring over ten feet in length,
Speaker 1: found buried alongside oversized stone tools and weapons. The implication
Speaker 1: was unavoidable. Whoever these people were, they were not only enormous,
Speaker 1: but technologically capable. Another article placed giant remains within ancient
Speaker 1: Native American burial mounds, suggesting a lost civilization that predated
Speaker 1: known indigenous cultures. This framing was deliberate and dangerous. It
Speaker 1: aligned neatly with a popular nineteenth century belief that America's
Speaker 1: ancient earthworks must have been built by a vanished race,
Speaker 1: not by native peoples still living on the land. As
Speaker 1: the stories multiplied, so did the claims some giants were
Speaker 1: said to have double rows of teeth. Others had elongated
Speaker 1: skulls or unusual bone density. A few reports suggested entire
Speaker 1: cemeteries of giants, implying a once widespread race wiped out
Speaker 1: by catastrophe or conflict. The Sun rarely claimed certainty, but
Speaker 1: it didn't need to. Each article ended with a familiar refrain,
Speaker 1: the remains had been sent east for further examination. Experts
Speaker 1: would report soon science would decide it never did. The
Speaker 1: bones always disappeared, lost in transit, misplaced, quietly, reburied. Museums
Speaker 1: never displayed them, Universities never cataloged them. No verified specimen
Speaker 1: ever survived scrutiny. Yet this absence only fueled speculation. If
Speaker 1: giants had existed, why wasn't history talking about them? What
Speaker 1: else had been erased? The timing of these stories mattered.
Speaker 1: The United States was expanding rapidly westward, uncovering ancient sites
Speaker 1: faster than scholars could properly study them. Archaeology was still
Speaker 1: in its infancy. Newspapers filled the gap with imagination, authority
Speaker 1: and urgency. Readers trusted print. If a paper set a
Speaker 1: skeleton was twelve feet tall, who was the average reader
Speaker 1: to argue? Religious interpretations followed quickly. Some saw the giants
Speaker 1: as confirmation of Biblical passages, describing the Nephelim, ancient beings
Speaker 1: of great stature who lived before a divine reckoning. Others
Speaker 1: framed them as evidence that humanity itself had degenerated over time,
Speaker 1: shrinking physically and spiritually from a more powerful past. The
Speaker 1: giants became a mirror, reflecting whatever fear or hope the
Speaker 1: reader already carried. Skeptics existed, but their voices were quiet.
Speaker 1: It was far more exciting to believe that America sat
Speaker 1: atop the bones of Titans than to accept that many
Speaker 1: of these discoveries were misidentified animal remains, exaggerated measurements, or
Speaker 1: outright fabrications. In some cases, mastodon or mammoth bones were
Speaker 1: mistaken for human in others. The stories appeared to have
Speaker 1: been invented wholesale, never meant to last, only to captivate,
Speaker 1: and captivate they did. By the late nineteenth century, the
Speaker 1: idea of ancient giants was woven firmly into American folklore.
Speaker 1: It appeared in sermons, schoolhouse debates, and later fringe archaeology.
Speaker 1: The sun didn't invent the myth, but it industrialized it,
Speaker 1: giving giants headlines, measurements, and just enough scientific polish to
Speaker 1: make them feel real. Like the Great Moon Hoax, the
Speaker 1: Giant discoveries revealed something deeper than their subject matter. They
Speaker 1: exposed a public hungry for lost worlds and hidden truths,
Speaker 1: and willing to trust confident storytelling over careful verification. The
Speaker 1: giants never needed to exist physically. They lived just fine
Speaker 1: in ink, and for a generation of readers, America was
Speaker 1: no longer just young and expanding. It was ancient, mysterious,
Speaker 1: and once ruled by beings far larger than life.
Speaker 2: Tired of boring facts getting in the way of a
Speaker 2: good story, subscribe to The Sun, the paper that bravely
Speaker 2: asks what if it's true?
Speaker 3: Though?
Speaker 2: From lunar Batman to giants in your backyard, we bring
Speaker 2: you tomorrow's myth today, with expert quotes, Latin names, and
Speaker 2: absolutely no follow up. The Sun. If it's in print,
Speaker 2: it must be real.
Speaker 1: In the nineteenth century, few deaths inspired as much dread
Speaker 1: and morbid fascination as spontaneous human combustion. According to newspapers,
Speaker 1: medical pamphlets, and repeated reports in the New York Sun,
Speaker 1: ordinary people were allegedly bursting into flames without warning, reduced
Speaker 1: to ash, while their surroundings remained inexplicably untouched and the
Speaker 1: most chilling part. These incidents weren't treated as rumor. They
Speaker 1: were treated as settled fact. The typical article followed a
Speaker 1: now familiar structure. A body, often elderly, frequently living alone,
Speaker 1: was discovered in a room that showed almost no signs
Speaker 1: of fire damage. A chair might be singed, a table
Speaker 1: slightly scorched, but the victim themselves was described as nearly obliterated,
Speaker 1: torso reduced to cinders, limbs partially intact, skull cracked by heat.
Speaker 1: One report noted that the feet were often left behind,
Speaker 1: still wearing slippers, as if the fire had politely avoided
Speaker 1: the floor. The sun in similar papers emphasized these details relentlessly.
Speaker 1: Windows were unbroken, candles were unlit, fireplaces were cold. There
Speaker 1: was no external source of ignition. Doctors were quoted as
Speaker 1: being baffled. Coroners admitted confusion. The conclusion, sometimes stated outright,
Speaker 1: sometimes allowed to hang in the air, was unavoidable. The
Speaker 1: fire had come from within. Alcohol quickly became the favored explanation.
Speaker 1: Many victims were described as habitual drinkers, and newspapers confidently
Speaker 1: suggested that years of spirits had rendered the human body flammable.
Speaker 1: One article explained that alcohol saturated the tissues, turning a
Speaker 1: person into a kind of walking tinderbox. The implication was
Speaker 1: moral as much as medical. Spontaneous combustion wasn't just a mystery,
Speaker 1: it was a warning. Other explanations followed. Some physicians speculated
Speaker 1: about internal chemical reactions, electrical forces, or unknown gases building
Speaker 1: up inside the body. A few leaned toward divine punishment,
Speaker 1: carefully avoiding outright sermons while still letting readers connect the dots.
Speaker 1: The language was cautious, but theatrical. The sun didn't say
Speaker 1: this will happen to you, It said this has already
Speaker 1: happened to others. The repetition mattered. These were not presented
Speaker 1: as isolated anomalies. Articles appeared again and again from England
Speaker 1: to France to America, creating the sense of a widespread,
Speaker 1: ongoing phenomenon. Each new case reinforced the last. If so
Speaker 1: many people had burned without cause, how could the explanation
Speaker 1: be anything but spontaneous. Even literature joined in. Charles Dickens
Speaker 1: famously included spontaneous combustion and bleak house, defending it vigorously
Speaker 1: when critics accused him of sensationalism, Dickens cited real newspaper accounts,
Speaker 1: many drawn from the same pool of stories circulated by
Speaker 1: the Sun and its contemporaries, as proof that the phenomenon
Speaker 1: was genus u in. Fiction and journalism fed each other
Speaker 1: until combustion felt not just possible but inevitable. Skeptics did exist.
Speaker 1: Some doctors quietly argued that slow burning fires ignited by candles, pipes,
Speaker 1: or embers could smolder for hours, consuming a body while
Speaker 1: leaving a room largely intact. The Wick effect, where human
Speaker 1: fat fuels a localized fire like a candle, was occasionally suggested,
Speaker 1: though not fully understood at the time, but these explanations
Speaker 1: lacked drama and drama in the eighteen hundreds sold papers.
Speaker 1: What readers absorbed instead was fear. If the human body
Speaker 1: could betray itself so violently, safety was an illusion. Death
Speaker 1: wasn't just lurking outside, It was already inside you, waiting
Speaker 1: for the wrong chemical moment. Spontaneous combustion turned the body
Speaker 1: into an unstable object, something no longer fully under human control.
Speaker 1: By the late nineteenth century, medical science began to catch up.
Speaker 1: Improved forensic methods and a better understanding of fire behavior
Speaker 1: quietly dismantled the mystery. Spontaneous combustion faded from serious discussion,
Speaker 1: reclassified as misinterpreted accidents rather than supernatural events. But the
Speaker 1: damage or the enchantment was done. Like the Great Moon
Speaker 1: Hoax and the giants of Ancient America, spontaneous human combustion
Speaker 1: thrived because it arrived dressed as authority. It was repeated, sighted, measured,
Speaker 1: and soberly discussed. It didn't ask readers to believe in magic.
Speaker 1: It asked them to trust the paper, and for decades
Speaker 1: they did. Because nothing is quite as terrifying or irresistible
Speaker 1: as the idea that the greatest danger you face might
Speaker 1: be yourself, quietly waiting to ignite.
Speaker 2: Do you own an ancient civilization accidentally buried under ice?
Speaker 2: Call polar Realty the leading firm and forgotten empires and
Speaker 2: inaccessible ruins. We specialize in cities that briefly appeared, vanished mysteriously,
Speaker 2: and left no physical evidence whatsoever. No streets, no problem,
Speaker 2: no artifacts. Even better, Polar Realty, if you can imagine it,
Speaker 2: we can almost find it.
Speaker 1: In the eighteen fifties, at the height of maritime exploration
Speaker 1: and scientific bravado, newspapers began suggesting that one of humanity's
Speaker 1: oldest myths had finally crossed the line into verified reality.
Speaker 1: According to reports circulated and amplified by the New York Sun,
Speaker 1: sailors in the South Pacific had encountered, and in some accounts,
Speaker 1: temporarily captured, a living mermaid, not a stitched carnival oddity,
Speaker 1: not a grotesque fake, a real, wreathing, intelligent being observed
Speaker 1: by credible men at sea. The articles were careful to
Speaker 1: distance themselves from earlier frauds. Readers were reminded subtly that
Speaker 1: this was not one of P. T. Barnum's infamous taxidermy curiosities.
Speaker 1: This creature was described as anatomically coherent, alive, and capable
Speaker 1: of movement and expression. From the waist up, she appeared
Speaker 1: unmistakably human, feminine facial features, long dark hair, expressive eyes.
Speaker 1: Below the waist, a powerful fish tail, scaled and muscular,
Speaker 1: adapted perfectly for ocean travel. The Sun leaned heavily on
Speaker 1: eyewitness testimony. Naval officers, ship surgeons, and seasoned sailors were
Speaker 1: quoted as calm observers, not excitable storytellers. One report claimed
Speaker 1: the mermaid had been seen resting on rocks near a
Speaker 1: remote island, watching ships pass with what was described as
Speaker 1: curiosity rather than fear. Another alleged she was briefly restrained
Speaker 1: in shallow water, during which time observers noted her breathing patterns,
Speaker 1: vocal sounds, and resistance. Details meant to reassure readers that
Speaker 1: this was biological observation, not fantasy. Scientific framing did most
Speaker 1: of the work. The articles suggested the mermaid might represent
Speaker 1: a missing evolutionary link, a branch of humanity adapted fully
Speaker 1: to marine life. Comparisons were drawn to seals, dew goongs,
Speaker 1: and newly cataloged species that blurred the lines between known categories.
Speaker 1: If strange mammals could exist in the ocean, why not
Speaker 1: aquatic humans. The question was posed gently, never aggressively, inviting
Speaker 1: wonder rather than demanding belief. Crucially, the mermaid was not
Speaker 1: portrayed as monstrous. She was intelligent, alert, and even dignified.
Speaker 1: Some accounts hinted at communication, nonverbal but deliberate gestures eye
Speaker 1: contact recognition. One passage speculated that mermaids might actively avoid
Speaker 1: human contact, explaining their rarity despite centuries of sightings. The
Speaker 1: implication was chilling and elegant. They weren't undiscovered, they were
Speaker 1: choosing not to be found. As with other such stories,
Speaker 1: the conclusion was always just out of reach. The mermaid escaped,
Speaker 1: she dove too deep. She vanished when seas grew rough.
Speaker 1: Specimens were never secured, but explanations were always ready. The
Speaker 1: ocean was vast, expeditions were being organized. Naturalists were eager.
Speaker 1: Confirmation felt inevitable, just not yet. Public reaction was a
Speaker 1: mix of awe and relief. Unlike stories of giants or combustion,
Speaker 1: the Mermaid inspired fascination more than fear. She suggested companionship
Speaker 1: rather than threat. The world was larger, richer, and kinder
Speaker 1: than previously assumed. Myths, it seemed, were not childish lies,
Speaker 1: but memories of truths misunderstood by time. Skeptics again raised objections.
Speaker 1: Many sightings could be explained by manatees, dew goongs, or
Speaker 1: seals glimpsed under poor conditions. Human pattern recognition did the rest,
Speaker 1: but these explanations lacked romance, and romance mattered. The sun
Speaker 1: never insisted. Skeptics were wrong. It simply gave them less space.
Speaker 1: By the late nineteenth century, as marine biology advanced and
Speaker 1: exploration increased, mermaids quietly retreated back into folklore. No living
Speaker 1: specimens ever emerged, no credible evidence survived scrutiny, yet the
Speaker 1: idea lingered, buoyed by those authoritative articles that once claimed
Speaker 1: the impossible had already been seen. Like the Moon civilizations
Speaker 1: and the ancient giants, the living mermaid thrived in a
Speaker 1: narrow historical moment when the world was still vast, science
Speaker 1: was still new, and newspapers could transform longing into fact.
Speaker 1: The ocean kept its secrets, but for a while, readers
Speaker 1: were allowed to believe that humanity was not alone in
Speaker 1: the deep, and that perhaps somewhere beyond the horizon, myth
Speaker 1: was still swimming, just out of reach. In the eighteen sixties,
Speaker 1: as Arctic exploration captured the Victorian imagination, newspapers began hinting
Speaker 1: at a revelation so staggering it threatened to rewrite human
Speaker 1: history itself. A city beneath the ice, According to reports
Speaker 1: circulated and eagerly amplified by the New York Sun, explorers
Speaker 1: venturing into the frozen polar regions had uncovered evidence not
Speaker 1: merely of survival, but of civilization buried under centuries of
Speaker 1: snow and ice. The stories emerged alongside real expeditions. The
Speaker 1: Arctic was still largely unmapped, its interior unknown even to science.
Speaker 1: Ships vanished, crewise, froze, survivors returned with fragmented, half believed tails.
Speaker 1: Into this uncertainty stepped the articles, written with the same
Speaker 1: confident calm that had once populated the Moon and filled
Speaker 1: America with giants. The reports described explorers encountering stone structures
Speaker 1: protruding from the ice walls, too straight to be natural blocks,
Speaker 1: too deliberately shaped to be geological accidents. Some accounts mentioned
Speaker 1: stair like formations descending into frozen ground. Others described tools
Speaker 1: recovered from beneath the ice worked stone, carved implements, objects
Speaker 1: suggesting prolonged human habitation in a place now utterly inhospitable. Crucially,
Speaker 1: the city was never presented as fantastical. There were no
Speaker 1: gold domes or supernatural inhabitants. Instead, it was framed as ancient, practical,
Speaker 1: and tragically lost. The implication was that Earth's clas climate
Speaker 1: had once been radically different, that the poles were not
Speaker 1: always frozen wastelands, but once temperate regions capable of sustaining life.
Speaker 1: The city beneath the ice became evidence not of myth,
Speaker 1: but of forgotten epochs. Some articles leaned into broader speculation.
Speaker 1: Could this be proof of a pre Ice Age civilization,
Speaker 1: a northern counterpart to Atlantis, a culture erased not by
Speaker 1: war but by climate itself. The Sun quoted unnamed scholars
Speaker 1: who suggested humanity's timeline was far longer than textbooks admitted. Civilization,
Speaker 1: they hinted, may have risen and fallen multiple times before
Speaker 1: history ever bothered to record it. As always, verification hovered
Speaker 1: just out of reach. The structures were glimpsed briefly before
Speaker 1: storms forced retreat. Artifacts were allegedly lost when ships were
Speaker 1: damaged or abandoned. Further expeditions were promised, Funding was discussed.
Speaker 1: The ice, readers were reminded was constantly shifting, revealing and
Speaker 1: concealing its secrets at random. The public was captivated. The
Speaker 1: idea of a buried city appealed to a growing Victorian
Speaker 1: anxiety that progress was fragile. If an entire civilization could
Speaker 1: be swallowed by ice, what did that say about modern society?
Speaker 1: Industrialization felt unstoppable, but these stories whispered that nature had
Speaker 1: erased greatness before and would do so again. Skeptics countered
Speaker 1: that ice pressure could fracture rock into geometric shapes, that
Speaker 1: explorers under stress might misinterpret natural formations, and that no
Speaker 1: confirmed artifacts ever reached museums. But skepticism struggled against imagination.
Speaker 1: The Arctic was distant, harsh, inaccessible. If a city were
Speaker 1: hidden there, who could easily prove otherwise. By the late
Speaker 1: nineteen century, as polar science advanced and mapping improved, the
Speaker 1: buried city quietly vanished from serious discussion. No ruins were found,
Speaker 1: no streets emerged from the ice. The story dissolved into
Speaker 1: the broader category of lost civilizations, joining Atlantis, Lemuria, and
Speaker 1: other places that existed most convincingly on paper. Yet for
Speaker 1: a brief moment, the frozen North was more than an
Speaker 1: empty frontier. It was a tomb for humanities forgotten past,
Speaker 1: a reminder that history might not be a straight line forward,
Speaker 1: but a cycle of rise, collapse, and burial. Like the giants,
Speaker 1: the Mermaid, and the Moon's imagined inhabitants, the city beneath
Speaker 1: the ice succeeded because it didn't shout, it suggested. It
Speaker 1: wrapped speculation in exploration and fear in scholarship. It allowed
Speaker 1: readers to believe that the greatest discoveries were not ahead
Speaker 1: of them, but already lost, frozen in silence, waiting just
Speaker 1: beneath the ice. And that's where we'll leave it, standing
Speaker 1: at the edge of the ice, staring down into a
Speaker 1: past that may never have existed, but once felt entirely possible.
Speaker 1: The city beneath the ice, like the giants in the earth,
Speaker 1: the mermaid in the sea, and the civilizations on the moon,
Speaker 1: reminds us that the nineteenth century wasn't just an age
Speaker 1: of discovery. It was an age of belief, a moment
Speaker 1: when science was powerful enough to inspire awe, but not
Speaker 1: yet powerful enough to demand proof. Newspapers didn't just report
Speaker 1: the world as it was. They shaped the world people
Speaker 1: wanted to live in, one filled with lost cities, hidden histories,
Speaker 1: and truths just out of reach. These stories endured not
Speaker 1: because they were true, but because they were comforting, thrilling,
Speaker 1: and unsettling in exactly the right proportions. They suggested that
Speaker 1: the world was bigger than we understood, older than we'd
Speaker 1: been told, and still holding secrets beneath its surface, and
Speaker 1: maybe that's why they linger not as facts, but as
Speaker 1: echoes of a time when wonder traveled faster than verification. Now,
Speaker 1: Dear listeners, I am not saying there isn't mer people
Speaker 1: or lost cities under ice, or our lands were not
Speaker 1: once roamed by giants. I'd like to think there is
Speaker 1: some fact there, and I am excited as technology improves
Speaker 1: we will find more answers. I believe civilizations have risen
Speaker 1: and fallen over and over for millions of years, wiped
Speaker 1: out by cataclysms we don't know about. It's likely to
Speaker 1: happen again. For now, we live in the wonder and curiosity.
Speaker 1: These things conjure in our imaginations.
Speaker 2: This episode is brought to you by Speaker, the podcast
Speaker 2: hosting platform that understands one simple truth. If it sounds
Speaker 2: confident enough, people will believe it. Got a show about
Speaker 2: lost cities under ice, moon batmen, a mermaid, your cousin's
Speaker 2: uncle definitely saw once. Spreaker gives you unlimited hosting, detailed analytics,
Speaker 2: and distribution to Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeart, and more so,
Speaker 2: your beautifully researched chaos reaches the widest audience possible, spreaker,
Speaker 2: because unlike nineteenth century newspapers, you should probably know how
Speaker 2: many people are listening. Start your podcast today. No hydro
Speaker 2: oxygen telescope required.
Speaker 1: So, dear listeners, what happened to The New York Sun.
Speaker 1: It didn't vanish in a blaze of scandal or get
Speaker 1: shut down for inventing moon Batman. Ironically, it survived quite
Speaker 1: a long time after its most famous hoaxes. Here's what
Speaker 1: actually happened. The New York Sun was founded in eighteen
Speaker 1: thirty three and became wildly popular by doing something radical
Speaker 1: for its time. It was cheap, sensational, and written for
Speaker 1: ordinary people, not elites. Crime stories, human interest oddities, shocking discoveries,
Speaker 1: and yes, the occasional reality adjacent fantasy were its bread
Speaker 1: and butter. The Great Moon Hoax didn't hurt it at all.
Speaker 1: In fact, it cemented The Sun's reputation and boosted circulation enormously.
Speaker 1: For decades, the paper thrived, but by the late eighteen
Speaker 1: hundreds the media world changed. Larger papers like Joseph Pulitzer's
Speaker 1: New York World and William Randolph Hurst's New York Journal
Speaker 1: entered the scene with deeper pockets, bigger staffs, and even
Speaker 1: louder sensationalism. Yellow journalism escalated. Competition intensified The Sun once
Speaker 1: the bold upstart started to look old fashioned. In eighteen
Speaker 1: ninety eight, the original New York Sun shut down, unable
Speaker 1: to compete financially in an increasingly brutal newspaper market. Then,
Speaker 1: because history love sequels, it came back. A revived New
Speaker 1: York Sun appeared in nineteen sixteen, positioning itself as more serious, conservative,
Speaker 1: and politically influential. This version became famous for publishing the
Speaker 1: now legendary eighteen ninety seven editorial, Yes, Virginia, there is
Speaker 1: a Santa Claus, often mistakenly associated with the earlier Sun.
Speaker 1: It ran for several more decades, but circulation steadily declined.
Speaker 1: In nineteen fifty, the New York Sun printed its final issue,
Speaker 1: no dramatic farewell, no apology tour for lunar civilizations, just
Speaker 1: to quiet end. Today, the Sun is remembered less as
Speaker 1: a newspaper and more as a case study in belief
Speaker 1: how authority, timing, and confidence storytelling can turn speculation into
Speaker 1: accepted reality. It didn't collapse because it lied, It collapsed
Speaker 1: because the media ecosystem outgrew it, and perhaps that's the
Speaker 1: most ironic ending of all. The paper that once convinced
Speaker 1: the world there were cities on the Moon was ultimately undone,
Speaker 1: not by fiction, but by competition. Next time, we'll dig
Speaker 1: into another moment when ink outran evidence and reality struggled
Speaker 1: to catch up. Until then, keep questioning the footnotes, and
Speaker 1: remember just because a story was printed doesn't mean it
Speaker 1: ever thawed into truth.
Speaker 3: Bound the.
Speaker 4: Cop budbod.
Speaker 3: Do bud
Speaker 4: Comput
Podbean