Election Fraud: Cooping, Political Gangs, What It Had To Do With The Death of Edgar Allan Poe|The Strange History Podcast
Tonight's Episode
Long before modern debates about election fraud, American democracy had a darker, far more violent secret. In this episode of The Strange History Podcast, we uncover the forgotten 19th-century crime known as cooping—a brutal form of election fraud where voters were kidnapped, drugged, disguised, and forced to vote again and again for political machines. This episode dives deep into how election fraud operated openly in cities like Baltimore and New York, how political gangs controlled polling places, and why reform came only after years of violence and public deaths. At the center of this story is Edgar Allan Poe, found delirious on Election Day in 1849, wearing someone else’s clothes, outside a polling station—never to recover. Was one of America’s greatest writers a victim of election fraud? And how many unnamed people disappeared into the system before democracy cleaned up its act? This episode explores historical election fraud, political corruption, voter manipulation, and the shocking truth about how democracy actually functioned in 19th-century America. Perfect for fans of strange history, true crime, political history, and unexplained deaths.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-strange-history-podcast--5773362/support.
🎧 The Strange History Podcast Love bizarre true stories, forgotten scandals, and history’s most unhinged moments?
Submit your ideas for The Strange History Podcast
Follow The Strange History Podcast wherever you listen and never miss an episode. 🔗 Listen & Subscribe:
Apple Podcasts
Spotify
iHeartRadio
Audible
New episodes regularly. History gets weird here.
Speaker 1: Hello, dear listeners, and welcome back to the Strange History Podcast,
Speaker 1: where history rarely dies peacefully in its sleep and almost
Speaker 1: always leaves a note written in something unsettling. I'm Amy,
Speaker 1: and today we're diving into the story of cooping, election
Speaker 1: day violence, and the final days of Edgar Allan Poe.
Speaker 1: But before we throw Poe into the streets of Baltimore,
Speaker 1: we need to stop and understand what copping actually is.
Speaker 1: Cooping refers to a nineteenth century form of election fraud
Speaker 1: where political gangs kidnapped, drugged, and disguised vulnerable people, often
Speaker 1: homeless men, to repeatedly vote for a specific candidate, and
Speaker 1: cooping death usually describes the theory that writer Edgar Allan
Speaker 1: Poe died as a victim of this practice in eighteen
Speaker 1: forty nine, Found disoriented and wearing ill fitting clothes on
Speaker 1: election day. Victims were plied with alcohol or beaten in
Speaker 1: a seller the coop, and then sent to vote multiple
Speaker 1: times in different outfits to rig the election, and Poe's
Speaker 1: mysterious death on election day in Baltimore fits many characteristics
Speaker 1: of being cooped, though other theories exist. But let's actually
Speaker 1: sit with the man himself, because Poe was not just
Speaker 1: a Gothic archetype who wandered out of the fog to
Speaker 1: mutter about ravens. He was a real person, a complicated one,
Speaker 1: a fragile one, and by eighteen forty nine, a man
Speaker 1: already living on the edge of exhaustion, grief, and physical collapse.
Speaker 1: Edgar Allan Poe's life was defined early by loss. His
Speaker 1: father abandoned the family, and his mother, an actress, died
Speaker 1: of tuberculosis before Poe was three. He was taken in
Speaker 1: by John and Francis Allen, wealthy merchants in Richmond, but
Speaker 1: never formally adopted. That detail matters because Poe spent his
Speaker 1: entire life hovering between worlds, never fully belonging, never financially secure,
Speaker 1: never certain of his place. He was brilliant, sharp tongued,
Speaker 1: and deeply sensitive to criticism. Poe could be charming and
Speaker 1: witty in company, but he was also prone to deep
Speaker 1: depressive episodes, anxiety, and long stretches of self doubt. He
Speaker 1: struggled constantly with money. Even at the height of his fame,
Speaker 1: he lived hand to mouth, writing reviews, poems and short
Speaker 1: stories for pennies while helping invent entire literary genres that
Speaker 1: paid him almost nothing, and despite the later myths, Poe
Speaker 1: was not perpetually drunk. In fact, alcohol hit him unusually hard.
Speaker 1: Friends described him as having an extreme sensitivity. One or
Speaker 1: two drinks could leave him completely incapacitated. This wasn't indulgence,
Speaker 1: it was physiological. He later joined temperance movements and tried
Speaker 1: repeatedly to avoid alcohol altogether, which is important when we
Speaker 1: consider how disoriented and intoxicated he appeared in Baltimore. Poe's
Speaker 1: personal life was just as fraught. He married his cousin,
Speaker 1: Virginia Clem when she was very young, a fact that
Speaker 1: makes modern readers uncomfortable, and did little to help his
Speaker 1: reputation even then. But by most accounts, the relationship was
Speaker 1: affectionate rather than predatory, and Virginia was the emotional center
Speaker 1: of Poe's life. When she died of tuberculosis in eighteen
Speaker 1: forty seven, Poe unraveled after Virginia's death, His letters grow darker,
Speaker 1: more erratic. Friends noticed his health declining. He oscillated between
Speaker 1: hope and despair, talking excitedly about new literary projects one
Speaker 1: day and sinking into paranoia the next. He was lonely
Speaker 1: he was grieving, and he was physically unwell. Yet in
Speaker 1: the months before his death, Poe was also trying desperately
Speaker 1: to rebuild. In eighteen forty nine, he was engaged to
Speaker 1: Sarah Elmira Royster, a woman from his youth, and for
Speaker 1: the first time in years, friends reported that Poe seemed optimist.
Speaker 1: He spoke of settling down, of stability, of finally escaping poverty.
Speaker 1: He was planning lectures, editing projects, and new writing ventures.
Speaker 1: He was, not, by most accounts, in a suicidal spiral,
Speaker 1: which makes what happened next all the more disturbing. When
Speaker 1: Poe left Richmond for what should have been a straightforward
Speaker 1: journey north, something went terribly wrong. He vanished for days,
Speaker 1: no confirmed sightings, no letters, no explanations, and then he
Speaker 1: reappeared in Baltimore, confused, incoherent, and dressed like someone else entirely.
Speaker 1: That image clashes violently with who Poe was at the time.
Speaker 1: This was a man who cared deeply about his appearance
Speaker 1: and reputation, a man trying to re enter polite society,
Speaker 1: a man painfully aware of how easily he was dismissed
Speaker 1: as unstable. He would not have voluntarily wandered the streets
Speaker 1: drunk in the clothing he had on that election day,
Speaker 1: which brings us back inevitably to cooping. By eighteen forty nine,
Speaker 1: Poe was the perfect victim, physically frail, alcohol intolerant, alone, unprotected,
Speaker 1: recognizable enough to be targeted, but powerless enough to be used.
Speaker 1: If abducted, even a small amount of forced alcohol or
Speaker 1: drugs like laudanum could have pushed his system into collapse.
Speaker 1: Days of repeated abuse, disorientation, and exposure could easily explain
Speaker 1: the delirium, hallucinations, and eventual death. And then there is Reynold's.
Speaker 1: Poe's repeated cries of that name in the hospital have
Speaker 1: never been fully explained. Some speculate it referred to Jeremiah
Speaker 1: Reynolds and explorer Poe admired. Others believe it may have
Speaker 1: been the name of a political fixer or gang member
Speaker 1: involved in the election, or it could have been a
Speaker 1: fragment his mind grabbing for meaning as it unraveled. That
Speaker 1: ambiguity feels painfully appropriate. Poe died without clarity, without closure,
Speaker 1: without even a clear medical explanation. His burial was rushed,
Speaker 1: his records were lost, his reputation was hijacked by an
Speaker 1: enemy who painted him as a lifelong drunk and lunatic.
Speaker 1: And yet when you look closely, Poe's final days feel
Speaker 1: less like personal collapse and more like systemic violence. A
Speaker 1: man already worn thin by grief and poverty, steps into
Speaker 1: a city on its most dangerous day, a day when
Speaker 1: bodies were tools, when names didn't matter, when people were dressed, redressed, used,
Speaker 1: and discarded. If cooping killed Edgar Allan Poe, then his
Speaker 1: death was not poetic. It was bureaucratic, and somehow that
Speaker 1: may be the most horrifying ending of all. He was
Speaker 1: collateral damage. Let's talk about how widespread cooping really was,
Speaker 1: who ran it, who benefited from it, and wyat took
Speaker 1: far longer than you'd expect for anyone to seriously try
Speaker 1: to stop it. Because here's the uncomfortable truth. Cooping didn't
Speaker 1: exist on the fringes of American democracy. It lived right
Speaker 1: at the center of it. By the mid eighteen hundreds,
Speaker 1: political power in American cities didn't belong to voters in
Speaker 1: the modern sense. It belonged to machines. Political machines were
Speaker 1: tightly organized networks of party bosses, ward leaders, saloon owners,
Speaker 1: gang leaders, and fixers. They controlled jobs, housing, food, and protection.
Speaker 1: In exchange, they demanded loyalty and votes. Votes were currency,
Speaker 1: and when votes were scarce or uncertain, they were manufactured.
Speaker 1: Cooping thrived in cities where the population was transient and vulnerable.
Speaker 1: Immigrants fresh off ships, laborers without permanent addresses, men sleeping
Speaker 1: in boarding houses or alleyways. These people didn't have paper trails,
Speaker 1: they didn't have protection, and crucially, they didn't have anyone
Speaker 1: powerful who would come looking for them if they vanished
Speaker 1: for a day. Political gangs worked election day like a
Speaker 1: business operation. Scouts identified targets, enforcers grabbed them. Taverns doubled
Speaker 1: as holding areas. Ward leaders coordinated which polling stations needed reinforcements.
Speaker 1: Ballot stuffing was risky. Repeat voting by human beings was
Speaker 1: much harder to detect. A man could vote in one
Speaker 1: ward at dawn, another by noon, and a third before dusk.
Speaker 1: If he collapsed afterward, that was not the machine's problem.
Speaker 1: New York City's Five Points District became infamous for this
Speaker 1: kind of violence. Gangs like the Dead Rabbits and the
Speaker 1: Bowery Boys weren't just street tufts. They were political tools.
Speaker 1: They escorted voters, blocked opponents, intimidated reformers, and ran cooping
Speaker 1: operations openly. Newspapers described men being dragged out of flophouses
Speaker 1: and returned hours later, barely alive. Sometimes they weren't returned
Speaker 1: at all. And here's the part that should make modern
Speaker 1: listeners deeply uneasy. Everyone knew. Journalists wrote about cooping. Ministers
Speaker 1: condemned it, reformers gave speeches about it. Politicians privately admitted
Speaker 1: it existed and then quietly benefited from it. Anyway, the
Speaker 1: system wasn't broken. It was functioning exactly as designed. What
Speaker 1: made cooping especially insidious was its flexibility. It didn't require
Speaker 1: forged documents or centralized fraud. It relied on chaos, on exhaustion,
Speaker 1: on human bodies as reusable tools, and because victims were
Speaker 1: often marginalized, their suffering rarely generated public outrage. If a
Speaker 1: man died, he was written off as a drunk. If
Speaker 1: he survived but was ruined, he disappeared back into poverty.
Speaker 1: And if he complained, who would believe him. There are
Speaker 1: recorded cases of victims waking up days later with no
Speaker 1: memory of where they'd been, why they were injured, or
Speaker 1: why they suddenly owned unfamiliar clothing. Doctors treated these men
Speaker 1: for excessive intoxication, police shrugged, the machine rolled on. It's
Speaker 1: important to understand that cooping wasn't always about changing election outcomes.
Speaker 1: Sometimes it was about insuring margins. Sometimes it was about
Speaker 1: intimidating opposition voters into staying home. Sometimes it was just
Speaker 1: about showing power, about reminding a neighborhood who controlled the streets.
Speaker 1: And sometimes it was about revenge. There are accounts of
Speaker 1: men being deliberately targeted, not because they were useful voters,
Speaker 1: but because they were vocal reformers, political nuisances, or inconvenient witnesses.
Speaker 1: Cooping could be punishment as much as fraud, So why
Speaker 1: didn't it stop sooner? Because stopping cooping meant dismantling the
Speaker 1: entire higher political ecosystem that supported it. You couldn't end
Speaker 1: cooping without ending open air polling. You couldn't end open
Speaker 1: air polling without standardized ballots. You couldn't standardize ballots without
Speaker 1: voter registration. And voter registration threatened the very people who
Speaker 1: relied on fluid identities and invisible populations to stay in power.
Speaker 1: Reform came slowly, painfully, and often only after public bloodshed.
Speaker 1: Election riots in the mid and late eighteen hundreds finally
Speaker 1: pushed cities toward change. Police forces professionalized, polling places moved
Speaker 1: out of taverns, Registration lists became mandatory, ballots were standardized,
Speaker 1: voting became private, and as the system hardened, cooping withered,
Speaker 1: not because it was immoral, but because it became inefficient.
Speaker 1: By the early twentieth century, cooping had largely vanished, not
Speaker 1: replaced by purity, but by paperwork. Corruption didn't disappear, it evolved.
Speaker 1: Political machines learned to influence votes through housing jobs, food lines,
Speaker 1: and favors instead of fists and locked doors, which brings
Speaker 1: us back inevitably to Edgar Allan Poe. If Poe was
Speaker 1: a victim of cooping, his death wasn't an accident, It
Speaker 1: wasn't bad luck. It was the predictable outcome of a
Speaker 1: system that treated certain lives as expendable on election day.
Speaker 1: His fame only preserved his story. Thousands of others vanished
Speaker 1: without names, without records, without even a footnote. Poe didn't
Speaker 1: die because democracy failed. He died because democracy was operating
Speaker 1: as intended for someone else. Before we close, Tonight's sponsor
Speaker 1: would like a word.
Speaker 2: This episode is brought to you by repeaters Choice Tonic,
Speaker 2: perfect for long days, lost memories, and such political enthusiasm.
Speaker 2: You don't recall developing Repeater's choice, because if you're going
Speaker 2: to disappear for democracy, you might as well stay hydrated.
Speaker 1: And remember, dear listeners, the scariest part of cooping wasn't
Speaker 1: the violence. It was how normal it was. Thank you
Speaker 1: for listening to the Strange History Podcast. If you enjoyed
Speaker 1: this episode, subscribe, follow, and leave a review wherever you listen,
Speaker 1: and remember, dear listeners, Sometimes history doesn't kill you with
Speaker 1: a dagger. It just repeats itself. Sometimes it hands you
Speaker 1: a ballot, locks the door behind you, and waits. Subscribe, follow,
Speaker 1: and leave a review wherever you listen. And if you
Speaker 1: wake up on election day in someone else's clothing, well
Speaker 1: you can figure out the rest Until next time. Keep
Speaker 1: it Strange.
Podbean